Skip to main content
  • IETF email infrastructure transition planned for 11 September

    A transition to a new modern, modular, and containerized infrastructure for email services provided for ietf.org, iab.org, irtf.org, rfc-editor.org (including email lists) is scheduled for 11 September 2026 starting at 2200UTC, with message delivery delayed up to 60 minutes. Further updates will be provided closer to the transition.

    28 Aug 2026
  • Post-Quantum Authentication: Up Next

    Post-quantum key establishment has moved from standards into deployment. Post-quantum authentication has not moved nearly as far, and specification work is no longer the only constraint. The IAB is holding a workshop in Prague on 11 and 12 October 2026 to bring deployment experience together with the people working on the relevant protocols and standards.

    27 Aug 2026
  • IETF 126 post-meeting survey: what we heard

    The IETF 126 Vienna meeting was held 18-24 July 2026 and the results of the post-meeting survey are now available.

    27 Aug 2026
  • Meet our new IETF NOC Lead

    Joe Clarke has been appointed as the new IETF NOC Lead and in this post Joe introduces himself and sets out his priorities for the IETF Network.

    10 Aug 2026
  • Secretariat restructuring and staffing update

    There have been a few changes in IETF Administration LLC staffing since January of this year (2026) including the recent insourcing of the Secretariat, which are summarised here to give an overall view of the staffing structure.

    30 Jul 2026

Filter by topic and date

Filter by topic and date

A Diverse IETF

29 Jul 2013

I wanted to return to a topic that we have talked about before: increasing diversity at the IETF.

The word ‘diversity’ is a catch phrase, but I’m talking about bringing different kinds of people into the IETF who have not traditionally been here. Making IETF inclusive for all participants. I am very proud to report that at this Berlin meeting, we have attendees from a record 73 different countries. It is rare to have an organisation that draws people from so many places. This is something to be proud of.

But this is not enough. We need to go further. And I want to talk about the motivation in more depth. Why do we need to strive for a more inclusive IETF? And what are we doing about it? With this in mind, I worked with Pete Resnick to talk about our goals:

First off, we have room to improve. Geographic diversity is just one tiny aspect of the overall goal. What about vendors and operators? More academicsGender diversity? Reaching to the areas of the world where there is still relatively little participation? Helping different participants to become editors and leaders? Coping with different discussion cultures? We recently talked to someone who classified the IETF as a “harsh” environment. IETF discussions go very quickly to critique and criticism of proposals, often in unnecessarily dismissing manner. Food for thought for all of us to improve our communication?

Secondly, diverse teams work better. They have more experiences to draw on. They have several problem solving and communication styles. Thirdly, the world competes for talent. The IETF needs to welcome everyone.

So, what are we doing? We can not claim we have made much of an impact yet, but we have started a number of efforts that will hopefully lead to great improvements in the long run. The Internet Society is helping us by increasing their outreach and fellows programs. Our Administrative Committee is planning an upcoming meeting in South America. Our leadership wants to get involved in a number of other forums and local events. We created a design team to understand the diversity problem and suggest solutions to make the IETF more inclusive. Volunteers created a mentor program that helps newcomers get introduced to the IETF. And there is a record 265 newcomers in this meeting.

This is all great, but it is good to keep in mind that we have only started our journey. There is a lot of work ahead. And we are probably missing many things that we should be doing. Please send us feedback!

P.S. We wanted to thank Kathleen, Suresh, Mary, Adrian, Brian, Alissa, Barbara, and others for interesting discussions in this space.


Share this page